Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles

Supreme Court hears case for different-sex civil partnerships

Sep 29, 2018, 23:18 PM
Rebecca Steinfeld; Charles Keidan, civil partnership, opposite-sex couple, appeal
Slug : supreme-court-hears-case-for-different-sex-civil-partnerships
Meta Title : Supreme Court hears case for different-sex civil partnerships
Meta Keywords : Today (14 May 2018), Rebecca Hannah Steinfeld and Charles Robin Keidan bring their case for different-sex civil partnerships before the Supreme Court
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 14, 2018, 04:34 AM
Article ID : 117116

Today (14 May 2018), Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan bring their case for different-sex civil partnerships before the Supreme Court

The couple are appealing the decision by the Court of Appeal on 21 February 2017 refusing them judicial review of the Secretary of State’s decision not - at that stage - to propose any change to the bar on different-sex couples entering into a civil partnership.

Under the Civil Partnership Act 2004, civil partnerships are available only to same-sex couples. The appellants are a different-sex couple in a committed long-term relationship, which they wish to formalise. They have deep-rooted and genuine ideological objections to marriage based upon what they consider to be its historically patriarchal nature. They wish instead to enter into a civil partnership, which they consider would reflect their values and give due recognition to the equal nature of their relationship. They sought judicial review of the respondent’s continuing decision not to make changes to CPA 2004 to allow different-sex couples to enter in civil partnerships.

During the 2-day hearing, the Supreme Court will consider whether the bar on different-sex couples entering into civil partnerships breaches the appellants’ rights under Article 14 together with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from