The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Meta Title :Stuart Macdonald: ASBO prohibitions and young people - Hills v Chief Constable of Essex Police
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Nov 12, 2007, 09:02 AM
Article ID :89113
Stuart Macdonald, Lecturer in Law, Swansea University. Since coming into force in April 1999, the Anti-Social Behaviour Order (ASBO) has featured prominently in the Government's campaign against anti-social behaviour. Taking the six terms of schoolboy Joseph Hills' ASBO as its starting point, this commentary examines three general principles which the courts have said apply to the drafting of ASBO prohibitions and two broad categories of ASBO prohibitions those which prohibit behaviour that constitutes a criminal offence and those which impose so-called preventive prohibitions. It expresses doubt about all six terms of Hills' ASBO, and argues that the case illustrates fundamental problems, stemming from the disparity between the ASBO's original design and how it is currently being used, with the drafting of ASBO prohibitions. For the full article see Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol 19, No 3, 2007.
To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.