Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles
Authors

Staying matrimonial proceedings - a thing of the past?

Sep 29, 2018, 16:33 PM
Slug : staying-matrimonial-proceedings-a-thing-of-the-past
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 1, 2007, 06:17 AM
Article ID : 85385

Stephen Jarmain, One Garden Court, Temple. Where clients disagree about the correct forum for divorce proceedings and the other country concerned is not a signatory to the Brussels II legislation the forum non conveniens approach may no longer be valid, following a recent decision of the European Court of Justice. This article reviews the rules relating to jurisdiction as they relate to staying proceedings between Brussels signatory countries and in favour of non-Brussels signatory countries. It then goes on to look at the case of Owusu v Jackson [2005] QB 801, which, on reference to the European Court of Justice from the Court of Appeal, suggests that the Brussels II rules should be applied uniformly, whether or not the competing jurisdiction is a signatory, and that the doctrine of forum non conveniens has not survived Brussels II. For the full article see May [2007] Fam Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from