Stasik v Poland (Application No. 21823/12)
Sep 29, 2018, 22:30 PM
Private law children - Contact - Enforcement - Whether there had been a breach of Arts 6 and 8 of the European Convention
The European Court of Human Rights found the Polish authorities to have been in breach of Arts 6 and 8 of the European Convention in failing to enforce contact arrangements between a father and son and in the excessive length of the proceedings.
Slug :
stasik-v-poland-application-no-21823-12
Meta Title :
Stasik v Poland (Application No. 21823/12)
Meta Keywords :
Private law children - Contact - Enforcement - Whether there had been a breach of Arts 6 and 8 of the European Convention
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
No
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
No
Date :
Oct 14, 2015, 05:21 AM
Article ID :
116634
(European Court of Human Rights, 6 October 2015)
Private law children - Contact - Enforcement - Whether there had been a breach of Arts 6 and 8 of the European Convention
Please see attached file below for the full judgment.The European Court of Human Rights found the Polish authorities to have been in breach of Arts 6 and 8 of the European Convention in failing to enforce contact arrangements between a father and son and in the excessive length of the proceedings.
FOURTH SECTION
(Application no. 21823/12)
STRASBOURG
6 October 2015
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Stasik v. Poland
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section)
sitting as a Chamber composed of: Guido Raimondi, President, George Nicolaou, Ledi Bianku, Nona Tsotsoria, Paul Mahoney, Krzysztof Wojtyczek, Yonko Grozev, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar
Having deliberated in private on 1 September 2015
Delivers the following:
Stasik v Poland (Application No. 21823/12)
Judgment
Categories :
- Judgments
- Private Law Children
Provider :
Product Bucket :
.jpg?sfvrsn=e5a4f948_1)
![JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/images/article_provider/flr_cover.tmb-desktoplat.jpg?sfvrsn=66b9ac90_3)
5 MAR 2021
![JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/images/article_provider/flr_cover.tmb-moblatest.jpg?sfvrsn=66b9ac90_3)
Leave a commentOrder by
Newest on top Oldest on top