The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Standing alone: going to the family court without a lawyer
Sep 29, 2018, 22:52 PM
family law, litigants in person, lip, LASPO, access to justice, mental health, standing alone, citizens advice bureau
Standing Alone: going to the family court without a lawyer identifies where the family court process didn’t work well for litigants in person and makes key recommendations about how courts, professionals and other service providers can address these challenges.
Meta Title :Standing alone: going to the family court without a lawyer
Meta Keywords :family law, litigants in person, lip, LASPO, access to justice, mental health, standing alone, citizens advice bureau
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Mar 29, 2016, 03:48 AM
Article ID :111963
The family courts are vital in helping people resolve a range of issues. However, the way people use them is changing. Since funding for legal aid was reduced in 2013, there has been an increase in the number of people going to the family courts without a lawyer (as a ‘litigant in person’). Two-thirds of our advisers report an increase in the number of people they see going to court without representation since 2013.
Although some people find the experience of self-representation positive, the majority found self representing difficult, time consuming and emotionally draining. As well as a bad experience for court users, it also means litigants in person achieve worse outcomes compared with their represented counterparts.
Nine in ten litigants in person say it affected at least one other aspect of their life.Standing alone: going to the family court without a lawyerexplores the four key areas affected: mental and physical health, working lives, finances and relationships.
The report identifies eight ways to improve the process of going to the family court alone:
Litigants in person need a clear way to navigate through the court process.
Information should be easy to find, consistent, reliable and user-friendly.
Paperwork and processes should be designed with the layperson in mind.
The physical court environment must help, not hinder, litigants in person.
Litigants in person need the tools to cope with pre-trial negotiations.
Guidance for legal professionals needs universal adoption.
People need more information to make the most of lawyers' services.
Evidence requirements shouldn’t be a barrier to those eligible for legal aid.
The report makes three key recommendations about how courts, professionals and other service providers can address these challenges:
Litigants in person need access to reliable advice and information to determine the validity of their case; investigate alternatives to court; progress their case through different stages; represent themselves effectively and deal with outcomes.
Processes, physical courts and professionals’ behaviour should respond to the increased numbers of litigants in person by ensuring best practice for working with laypeople is provided consistently.
Support for vulnerable people should be more easily accessed. Victims of domestic abuse should be able to access the legal advice and representation to which they are entitled. Other vulnerable groups, such as people with mental health problems, should be signposted to appropriate services.
Standing alone: going to the family court without a lawyerforms part of aprogramme of workexploring how well the justice system works for the public.