Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Rattan v Kuwad [2021] EWCA Civ 1
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Macur, Moylan and Asplin LJJ, 11 January 2021)Financial remedies – Maintenance pending suit – Order set aside – AppealThe wife’s appeal from...
SMO (a child) (by their litigation friend (acting as a representative claimant pursuant to CPR 19.6)) v TikTok Inc. and others [2020] EWHC 3589 (QB)
(Queen's Bench Division, Warby J, 30 December 2020)Practice and procedure - Anonymity – 12-year-old bringing claim against TikTok for breach of data protection legislation – Claimant...
Coronavirus: Separated Families and Contact with Children in Care FAQs (UK)
The House of Commons Library has published a paper providing brief information in response to some key questions regarding the impact of the Coronavirus outbreak on separated families,...
The Benefit Of Cohabitation Agreements
Many couples in Britain today live together without being married or forming a civil partnership. For some, the legal status of this situation isn’t well understood - do unmarried cohabitants...
Wills and Coronavirus
With the coronavirus pandemic we have seen a significant increase in demand for Wills. However, the social distancing, lockdown and shielding measures introduced by the Government to help fight the...
View all articles
Authors

Special guardianship orders: make in haste but repent at leisure?

Jan 10, 2020, 10:34 AM
There has been much written recently about Special Guardianship Orders (‘SGOs’); whether they are made too frequently or too early, whether they are ‘high risk’,
Slug :
Meta Title : Special guardianship orders: make in haste but repent at leisure?
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 10, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

Leslie Samuels QC, Pump Court Chambers

There has been much written recently about Special Guardianship Orders (‘SGOs’); whether they are made too frequently or too early, whether they are ‘high risk’, whether special guardians are sufficiently involved in the court process and whether they are properly supported by local authorities. Drawing on the case law and research material now available the conclusions reached are:

(1) Without question, there is a place for such an order in the judicial armoury.
(2) There is no convincing evidence that SGOs carry any greater risk than the making of any other family law order.
(3) Where errors have been made in the past, they are likely to lie in the attempt to truncate the assessment process.
(4) Placements have no doubt been made, in the past, ‘in haste’ and without a proper opportunity for the relationship between the child and proposed special guardian to be developed and assessed. In this context, a new form of order would be very welcome.
(5) Enabling the proposed special guardian to participate fully in the proceedings is critical. 
(6) The proper assessment for and provision of support services to the special guardian is often critical to secure the viability of the placement. 


The full article will be published in the January issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

 

 

 

 

 


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from