Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
Now is the time to reassess presumption f parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Hadkinson orders – applicability in financial remedy proceedings
Hassan Sarwar, Cornwall Street BarristersHassan Sarwar considers the development and usage of Hadkinson Orders in financial remedy proceedings.  The article provides a helpful overview of a...
View all articles
Authors

Special guardianship and permanency planning: unforeseen consequences and missed opportunities [2008] CFLQ 359

Sep 29, 2018, 17:51 PM
Title : Special guardianship and permanency planning: unforeseen consequences and missed opportunities [2008] CFLQ 359
Slug : special-guardianship-and-permanency-planning-unforeseen-consequences-and-missed-opportunities-2008-cflq-359
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Sep 16, 2011, 05:26 AM
Article ID : 95707

Special guardianship orders were introduced to supplement the range of options for permanency for children who cannot live with their birth parents. Intended to reduce the numbers of children in care, their introduction led to much speculation as to their potential use. This article presents findings from a research study investigating the use of special guardianship since its availability in December 2005. They suggest that special guardianship is proving to be a valued addition to the range of options for permanence for children. However, government aspirations for special guardianship, namely to reduce the numbers of looked after children, do not appear to have been met. Furthermore, the opportunities offered by special guardianship, to revisit prevailing approaches to permanency planning and the role of adoption, appear to have been missed.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from