Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
Now is the time to reassess presumption f parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Hadkinson orders – applicability in financial remedy proceedings
Hassan Sarwar, Cornwall Street BarristersHassan Sarwar considers the development and usage of Hadkinson Orders in financial remedy proceedings.  The article provides a helpful overview of a...
View all articles
Authors

Sheffield City Council v E and Another - capacity to marry and the rights and responsibilities of married couples

Sep 29, 2018, 17:20 PM
Title : Sheffield City Council v E and Another - capacity to marry and the rights and responsibilities of married couples
Slug : sheffield-city-council-v-e-and-another-capacity-to-marry-and-the-rights-and-responsibilities-of-married-couples
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Mar 23, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89351

Ruth Gaffney Rhys, Senior Lecturer in Law, Newport Business School, University of Wales, Newport. In Sheffield City Council v E and Another [2004] EWHC 2808 (Fam), [2005] 2 WLR 953, the Family Division of the High Court recently held that an individual has capacity to marry if he or she understands the nature of the marriage contract, ie that marriage normally involves certain obligations. The court then proceeded to define the rights and responsibilities that normally attach to marriage. This commentary considers the level of knowledge required to satisfy the test for capacity to marry. It assesses whether the rights and responsibilities referred to in the case are actually legal obligations and considers whether they are simple enough for an ordinary person to understand.

See Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol 18, No 1, 2006.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from