Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Rattan v Kuwad [2021] EWCA Civ 1
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Macur, Moylan and Asplin LJJ, 11 January 2021)Financial remedies – Maintenance pending suit – Order set aside – AppealThe wife’s appeal from...
SMO (a child) (by their litigation friend (acting as a representative claimant pursuant to CPR 19.6)) v TikTok Inc. and others [2020] EWHC 3589 (QB)
(Queen's Bench Division, Warby J, 30 December 2020)Practice and procedure - Anonymity – 12-year-old bringing claim against TikTok for breach of data protection legislation – Claimant...
Coronavirus: Separated Families and Contact with Children in Care FAQs (UK)
The House of Commons Library has published a paper providing brief information in response to some key questions regarding the impact of the Coronavirus outbreak on separated families,...
The Benefit Of Cohabitation Agreements
Many couples in Britain today live together without being married or forming a civil partnership. For some, the legal status of this situation isn’t well understood - do unmarried cohabitants...
Wills and Coronavirus
With the coronavirus pandemic we have seen a significant increase in demand for Wills. However, the social distancing, lockdown and shielding measures introduced by the Government to help fight the...
View all articles
Authors

Sharon Shoesmith's Judicial Review hearing ends

Sep 29, 2018, 17:24 PM
Slug : sharon-shoesmith-s-judicial-review-hearing-ends
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 9, 2009, 09:56 AM
Article ID : 89873

The former Director of Children's Services for Haringey Council, Sharon Shoesmith, was in the High Court this week seeking a judicial review against Ofsted, the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families and Haringey Council for her dismissal last December in the wake of the Baby Peter tragedy.

Ms Shoesmith's legal team contend that the Joint Area Review report by Ofsted and her subsequent dismissal totally disregarded the rules of natural justice and the statutory arrangements made under s20(5) of the Children Act 2004. They claim that the report was published and submitted to the Secretary of State without first giving Ms Shoesmith any opportunity to respond.

They also argue that the Secretary of State, Ed Balls, went beyond his powers when he removed Ms Shoesmith from her post on 1 December 2008 and that he was influenced by media pressure. Haringey Council formally dismissed her a week later.

She claims her career was ruined and she was left penniless and at times contemplating suicide as a result of her treatment.

The High Court heard evidence at the hearing yesterday that she was informed of the "very significant professional failings" in her department well before she was dismissed.

Ofsted inspectors were "shocked" by what they found when they carried out an inspection.

Ofsted inspector Heather Brown said in a statement before the court: "When I began the inspection, I was expecting and hoping to find that the case of Baby P was essentially an aberration. What we found was shocking, even for the highly experienced team that worked on the inspection."

Baby Peter was 17-months-old and on the at-risk register when he died at the hands of his mother, her boyfriend and their lodger in August 2007.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from