Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re P (Circumcision: Child in Care) [2021] EWHC 1616 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cobb J, 14 June 2021)Parental Responsibility – Circumcision – 21-month-old Muslim child – Raised in non-Muslim household of extended family – Mother sought...
R (Care Proceedings Joinder of Foster Carers) [2021] EWCA Civ 875
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Baker, Carr, Lewis LJJ, 15 June 2021)Practice and Procedure – Care proceedings – Foster carers joined as party to care proceedings – AppealThe...
The family court’s role in micro managing ‘trivial’ disputes
Sarah Higgins, Partner, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPThe decision in Re (B) (a child) (Unnecessary Private Law Applications) [2020] EWFC B44 dealt with the family court’s role in micro...
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
View all articles
Authors

Shared residence and tax credits

Sep 29, 2018, 16:12 PM
Slug : shared-residence-and-tax-credits
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 29, 2007, 04:21 AM
Article ID : 84917

David Burrows, Solicitor Advocate. The benefits system is based on narrow and often discriminatory assumptions. One of these is that only one or other parent can care for a child and thus receive benefits or tax credits. In the case of child benefit the legislation instructs us that if in doubt, we should assume that the mother is the carer. In the case of Hockenjos v Secretary of State for Social Security (No 2) [2004] EWCA Civ 1749, [2005] 1 FLR 1009 Ward LJ condemned the law's 'demeaning discrimination against fathers'. This article examines the provisions of the current law from a critical perspective, identifying the areas which are dissatisfactory and in need of reform, concluding that unless there is a change to the law then each benefit and tax credit is going to have to be picked off, one by one, in the Court of Appeal, by equal sharing parents. For the full article see June [2007] Fam Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from