Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Shared residence and tax credits

Sep 29, 2018, 16:12 PM
Slug : shared-residence-and-tax-credits
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 29, 2007, 04:21 AM
Article ID : 84917

David Burrows, Solicitor Advocate. The benefits system is based on narrow and often discriminatory assumptions. One of these is that only one or other parent can care for a child and thus receive benefits or tax credits. In the case of child benefit the legislation instructs us that if in doubt, we should assume that the mother is the carer. In the case of Hockenjos v Secretary of State for Social Security (No 2) [2004] EWCA Civ 1749, [2005] 1 FLR 1009 Ward LJ condemned the law's 'demeaning discrimination against fathers'. This article examines the provisions of the current law from a critical perspective, identifying the areas which are dissatisfactory and in need of reform, concluding that unless there is a change to the law then each benefit and tax credit is going to have to be picked off, one by one, in the Court of Appeal, by equal sharing parents. For the full article see June [2007] Fam Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from