Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles

SEXUAL ABUSE FINDING/APPEAL: Re S (Appeal from Sexual Abuse Findings) [2013] EWCA Civ 1254

Sep 29, 2018, 18:51 PM
Slug : sexual-abuse-finding-appeal-re-s-appeal-from-sexual-abuse-findings-2013-ewca-civ-1254
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 29, 2013, 03:00 AM
Article ID : 103923

(Court of Appeal, Rimer, McFarlane, Ryder LJJ, 24 October 2013)

When the child's parents separated she remained with the mother who remarried. After 10 months the father made an application for contact and during those proceedings the maternal aunt alleged that the step-father had physically abused the child. The father applied for a residence order based upon the allegations.

During the police ABE interview the child claimed the step-father had hit her which he denied. Police investigations revealed that the step-father had a previous conviction for indecent assault of a 17-year-old male.

The child was subsequently moved to her father's care at the maternal grandmother's home and the mother was prohibited from removing her. The child then disclosed that she had been sexually abused by the step-father which was repeated to the social worker and a note made of the discussion. A second ABE interview took place and the child was medically examined.

The medical evidence demonstrated disruption to the child's hymen but no physical evidence of penetration. The step-father was not charged. In welfare proceedings in relation to the child the judge found that the allegations were proven and a residence order was granted to the father. The step-father appealed the finding that he had sexually assaulted the child.

The appeal was dismissed. The judge had conducted a thorough examination of the evidence including an analysis of the reliability and credibility of the information and witnesses before her. While there were criticisms of the ABE interviewing technique there was nothing fatal to the interviews as evidential material. The experienced social worker gave detailed evidence about the suggestion that the child had been coached and expressed his opinion that a number of factors indicated she had not been coached. The judge cross referenced that opinion with her own observations and, accordingly, attached weight to his opinion as she was entitled to do.


Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from