Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

CORONER/ADMINISTRATION: Scotching v Birch

Sep 29, 2018, 17:09 PM
Slug : scotching-v-birch
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 18, 2008, 11:26 AM
Article ID : 87107

(Chancery Division; Patten J; 18 March 2008)

After the birth of the child, the couple's relationship broke down. The father eventually issued contact proceedings. The mother failed to attend a family court hearing, and shortly afterwards was found unconscious, having killed the child and attempted to kill herself. Because the parents, who had an equal interest in the child's estate, could not agree as to the burial arrangements for the child, the coroner refused to release the child's body without a court order. The father sought the grant of letters of administration, arguing that the mother was prohibited from applying for a grant of letters of administration on public policy grounds, in that she was not entitled to benefit from the estate of a person she had unlawfully killed. The mother argued that her right to respect for family life, under European Convention on Human Rights, Art 8, meant that she was entitled to apply for a grant of administration.

The mother's rights under Art 8 did not override the well-established and validated rule that a person should not benefit from her crimes. The mother could not apply for a grant of letters of administration; the letters of administration would be granted to the father, who was also entitled to a declaration that he was entitled to the child's body.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from