Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

IMMIGRATION: SB (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 28

Sep 29, 2018, 16:30 PM
Slug : sb-bangladesh-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-2007-ewca-civ-28
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 31, 2007, 07:38 AM
Article ID : 85237

(Court of Appeal; Ward, Neuberger and Gage LJJ; 31 January 2007)

The mother of two children with the right to remain in the UK, aged 22 and 16, sought indefinite leave to remain. The mother had initially entered under a visa obtained with false information; the mother was the second wife of the children's father, who had moved to the UK with his first wife many years before. The mother's six children had all moved to the UK over the years, living with the father until reaching adulthood. The father had now died, and his widow was unwilling for the two remaining stepchildren to stay with her. The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal rejected the mother's claim that her removal would be a disproportionate interference with her Art 8 rights, commenting that a properly structured application for leave to enter the UK by the mother, after she had returned to Bangladesh, ought to be accepted by an entry clearance officer.

When deciding whether the removal of the mother to Bangladesh would be disproportionate, that is whether her case was truly exceptional, the Tribunal should not have carried out or taken into account their own assessment of her prospects of coming back into the UK on an indefinite basis pursuant to an application for entry clearance made in Bangladesh. The case would be remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from