Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
The family court’s role in micro managing ‘trivial’ disputes
Sarah Higgins, Partner, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPThe decision in Re (B) (a child) (Unnecessary Private Law Applications) [2020] EWFC B44 dealt with the family court’s role in micro...
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
View all articles

Sandra Davis' Week: A tale of two Presidents

Sep 29, 2018, 17:56 PM
Slug : sandra-davis-week-5
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 10, 2010, 00:26 AM
Article ID : 91029

A tale of two Presidents

Sandra DavisSir Mark Potter's five year tenure as President of the Family Division was far from uneventful. During a period that saw intense interest in the workings of the Family Justice System, despite (or perhaps because of) his background as a commercial practitioner and judge, history will show that his tenure was a success.

He presided over a significant number of hugely important decisions (covering the entire panoply of family law: jurisdiction, finance, private and public law, international abduction and adoption). At the same time he oversaw fundamental changes to the management of the family justice system. 

Implementation of the rules allowing media access to family proceedings took place during his watch, as did a complete redraft of the Family Proceedings Rules (which are awaiting final sign off).

His most important contribution to the family justice system may, however, prove to have been made following his retirement. Sir Mark told The Observer last Sunday that he felt able to speak more freely now he had left his post.

He warned that children are now being placed in danger because the family courts are facing an "acute situation of crisis". A lack of adequate resources combined with a huge increase in the number of public law cases that have being issued in the last two years means that children are being "left for a considerable proportion of their early lives in atmospheres of violence, high emotion and parental dispute which, if prolonged, is bound to interfere with their long-term development and give rise to problems in adolescence and later life."

It falls to Sir Mark's successor, Sir Nicholas Wall, to find a way to manage the systemic problems facing the family courts; problems which will only get worse if the Government takes a hatchet to the family justice budget. The indications are that Sir Nicholas will be far less reticent in office than his predecessor. He has already warned that without more funding for family courts, the system will implode "and it is children who will suffer most".

In his address to the Annual Conference of the Association of Lawyers for Children last November (published in Family Law [2010] Fam Law 29) Sir Nicholas made his position clear. "Neither I, nor any of my colleagues has any wish to engage in politics" he said, continuing "But I do think - certainly in the field of family justice - that the time has now come when the historical and indeed instinctive judicial reluctance to go public over matters properly within our sphere of activity must come to an end. In common parlance, we must come off the bench. We must say what we think, and if we feel that the exercise of our proper functions is being impeded by anyone or anything, we should say so, loud and clear, and in plain language."

Fortunately, having initially rejected Sir Nicholas' appointment, the former Justice Secretary subsequently backed down. Having a past and current President who are both prepared to speak out forcibly against the lack of resources available to properly run the family justice system can only be in the best interests of children and their parents.

Sandra Davis is a Partner and Head of Family at Mishcon de Reya. She is a member of the firm's management board, a Fellow of the International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, the author of International Child Abduction (Sweet & Maxwell, 1993) and a member of the Lord Chancellor's Child Abduction Panel. In 2009 she was shortlisted in the Citywealth Magic Circle Awards as a Leading Lawyer.

The views expressed by contributing authors are not necessarily those of Family Law or Jordan Publishing and should not be considered as legal advice.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from