Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles
Authors

Rothschild v Charmaine De Souza [2018] EWHC 1855 (Fam)

Mar 28, 2019, 11:24 AM
Property – Beneficial ownership – Shares and properties – Claims that beneficial ownership belonged to husband’s mother
The court held that the company shares and five properties were owned beneficially by the husband and wife on a 50:50 basis.
Slug :
Meta Title : Rothschild v Charmaine De Souza [2018] EWHC 1855 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Property – Beneficial ownership – Shares and properties – Claims that beneficial ownership belonged to husband’s mother
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 28, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Mostyn J, 19 July 2018)

Property – Beneficial ownership – Shares and properties – Claims that beneficial ownership belonged to husband’s mother

The court held that the company shares and five properties were owned beneficially by the husband and wife on a 50:50 basis.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 1855 (Fam)

Case No: ZC16D00276

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 19/07/2018

Before :

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

Richard Rothschild
Applicant

- and -

Charmaine De Souza (Previously Rothschild)
1st Respondent

- and -

Wanda Radziszewska
2nd Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The Applicant acted in person
Charles Hale QC and Pippa Sanger (instructed by JMW Solicitors LLP) for the 1st Respondent
Brent Molyneux QC and James Weale (instructed by Levison Meltzer Pigott, solicitors) for the 2nd Respondent

Hearing dates: 2-6 July 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment
I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge will give a decision as to whether the judgment should be published with or without anonymisation.

 

Judgment: Rothschild v Charmaine de Souza [2018] EWHC 1855 (Fam)

 

 

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Property
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from