Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

FINANCIAL PROVISION/CONFLICT OF LAWS: Rhode v Rhode and Pembroke Square Ltd [2007] EWHC 496 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:16 PM
Slug : rhode-v-rhode-and-pembroke-square-ltd-2007-ewhc-496-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 17, 2007, 10:41 AM
Article ID : 87777

(Family Division; Baron J; 17 February 2007)

An application under Civil Jurisdictions and Judgments Act 1982, s 25, for an asset freezing order to assist with French divorce proceedings, following the procedure set out in Rayden para 27.47, had been correctly issued. The proceedings were family proceedings within the meaning of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991, as the application was a 'matrimonial cause or matter' within Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, s 32. The procedure set out in Rayden was to be adopted in such cases, which did not need to be issued under Civil Procedure Rules Pt 8. Given that: the husband was neither domiciled nor resident in England; the sum involved was not likely to make a significant difference to the final French award, and, most importantly, the French court had refused to grant the injunction, it was not appropriate for the injunction to be in place.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from