Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Changes to the law on Domestic Abuse
Official statistics (ONS (2016), March 2015 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW)) show that around 2 million people suffer from some form of domestic abuse each year in the UK. In...
Managing costs in complex children cases
In November 2020 Spice Girl Mel B was in the news, despairing about how the legal costs of trying to relocate her daughter Madison from the US to England were likely to bankrupt her, leading to her...
View all articles
Authors

Reversing the retreat from Gillick? R (Axon) v Secretary of State for Health

Sep 29, 2018, 17:39 PM
This article examines the issues presented by Axon including in particular the relationship between the adult's right to parental authority and the child's right to confidentiality.
Slug : reversing-the-retreat-from-gillick-r-axon-v-secretary-of-state-for-health
Meta Title : Reversing the retreat from Gillick? R (Axon) v Secretary of State for Health
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 17, 2007, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89035

Rachel Taylor, Christ Church, Oxford. In the case of R (Axon) v Secretary of State for Health [2006] EWHC 37 (Admin) (Axon) a parent's challenge to the policy of granting confidentiality to children seeking advice on sexual matters failed, and the case defended the policy of child confidentiality strongly. The judgment emphasises the rights and autonomy of mature minors.

This article considers Axon against the background of the case of Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] AC 112, where it was held that minors had the capacity to consent to medical treatment provided that they had sufficient maturity and understanding to decide on the matter in question. The concept of the Gillick competent child has been limited through future case law and although Axon did not challenge these limiting factors, it would seem that the case presents a powerful reassertion of the unrestricted Gillick principles.

This article examines the issues presented by Axon including in particular the relationship between the adult's right to parental authority and the child's right to confidentiality. The potential difficulties emerging from the ruling are also considered, and whether or not it can be said that there is a new dawn for children's autonomy. For the full article see Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol 19, No 1, 2007.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from