Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

Resolution response to the Financial Remedies Working Group final report

Sep 29, 2018, 21:37 PM
family law, resolution, jo edwards, financial remedies working group, final report, interim report, litigants in person, FRWG
Resolution welcomes the majority of the recommendations in the ​final report of the Financial Remedies Working Group (FRWG) released today, but remains concerned that the report and its recommendations focus largely on the needs of high net worth families, rather than the average family court user.
Slug : resolution-response-to-the-financial-remedies-working-group-final-report
Meta Title : Resolution response to the Financial Remedies Working Group final report
Meta Keywords : family law, resolution, jo edwards, financial remedies working group, final report, interim report, litigants in person, FRWG
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 26, 2015, 06:49 AM
Article ID : 108303
Resolution welcomes the majority of the recommendations in the final report of the Financial Remedies Working Group (FRWG) released today, but remains concerned that the report and its recommendations focus largely on the needs of high net worth families, rather than the average family court user.

Jo Edwards, chair of Resolution, comments:

'We welcome any move to make the family court more user-friendly, quicker to pass through and less expensive for court users, so we’re pleased that the FRWG has taken on board some of our recommendations about appropriate streamlining. However, we still fear that the report’s recommendations are most useful for cases involving wealthy litigants in contested proceedings. With more litigants in person coming before the courts than ever before, we would have liked to have seen the Working Group to delve more deeply into the issues facing the average court user.

In our consultation response we raised the need for the judiciary and others in a position to help litigants navigating the family courts alone to help these litigants understand the value of good, independent legal advice and the role it plays in resolving disputes and settling cases. I feel that the report of the Working Group does not fully address this issue, which will continue to grow, placing more strain on the overburdened court system. We do feel that the Working Group’s reticence to reintroduce the “Calderbank” without prejudice offer is a missed opportunity to encourage incentives to settle. We welcome the opportunity to discuss these issues further with the Working Group and other family justice stakeholders.'
Read Resolution’s response to the consultation here.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Resolution
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from