Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
Emotional harm and interim removal: how psychological thinking can support practice
Dr Ben Laskey ClinPsyD, AFBPS, Consultant Clinical Psychologist, The Psychology PartnershipGeorge Butler, Barrister at Law, 42 Bedford Row ChambersThe family courts are full of cases involving...
View all articles
Authors

Resolution response to the Financial Remedies Working Group final report

Sep 29, 2018, 21:37 PM
family law, resolution, jo edwards, financial remedies working group, final report, interim report, litigants in person, FRWG
Resolution welcomes the majority of the recommendations in the ​final report of the Financial Remedies Working Group (FRWG) released today, but remains concerned that the report and its recommendations focus largely on the needs of high net worth families, rather than the average family court user.
Slug : resolution-response-to-the-financial-remedies-working-group-final-report
Meta Title : Resolution response to the Financial Remedies Working Group final report
Meta Keywords : family law, resolution, jo edwards, financial remedies working group, final report, interim report, litigants in person, FRWG
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 26, 2015, 06:49 AM
Article ID : 108303
Resolution welcomes the majority of the recommendations in the final report of the Financial Remedies Working Group (FRWG) released today, but remains concerned that the report and its recommendations focus largely on the needs of high net worth families, rather than the average family court user.

Jo Edwards, chair of Resolution, comments:

'We welcome any move to make the family court more user-friendly, quicker to pass through and less expensive for court users, so we’re pleased that the FRWG has taken on board some of our recommendations about appropriate streamlining. However, we still fear that the report’s recommendations are most useful for cases involving wealthy litigants in contested proceedings. With more litigants in person coming before the courts than ever before, we would have liked to have seen the Working Group to delve more deeply into the issues facing the average court user.

In our consultation response we raised the need for the judiciary and others in a position to help litigants navigating the family courts alone to help these litigants understand the value of good, independent legal advice and the role it plays in resolving disputes and settling cases. I feel that the report of the Working Group does not fully address this issue, which will continue to grow, placing more strain on the overburdened court system. We do feel that the Working Group’s reticence to reintroduce the “Calderbank” without prejudice offer is a missed opportunity to encourage incentives to settle. We welcome the opportunity to discuss these issues further with the Working Group and other family justice stakeholders.'
Read Resolution’s response to the consultation here.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Resolution
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from