Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

RESIDENCE: Re O (Residence)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:35 PM
Slug : residence-re-o-residence
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 11, 2012, 03:30 AM
Article ID : 101137

(Court of Appeal, Thorpe, Rimer, Patten LJJ, 5 December 2012)

The mother who had residence of the child, applied for permission to relocate to Southern Ireland. The father saw the child regularly but did not have overnight staying contact. The mother submitted that relocation would enable her to spend more time with her child, as her commute to work would be shorter and she would be financially more secure. Plans for the father to have substantial staying contact during the holidays were proposed.

The judge granted the mother permission to relocate but before the order was perfected the father, who had been withholding payment of maintenance arrears, offered to make payment and commit to making future periodical payments as well as making a substantial contribution to the mother's costs. The judge accepted that the financial offer made the mother's position in England more viable but on the whole found that relocation offered more benefits than disadvantages to the child. The father's application for a further Cafcass report and separate representation of the child were refused. The father appealed.

The appeal was dismissed. The judge could not be criticised for focusing on the practicalities and financial security as well as the emotional security of the mother. A further report would not add anything or alter the judge's conclusion. There was no foundation for a decision overturning the orders below.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from