Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles

RESIDENCE: Re K (Residence) [2012] EWCA Civ 1306

Sep 29, 2018, 18:33 PM
Slug : residence-re-k-residence-2012-ewca-civ-1306
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 16, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 100915

(Court of Appeal, Ward, Aikens, Black LJJ, 25 July 2012)

In proceedings in relation to four children aged 14, 13, 7 and 4 concerns were raised regarding the turbulent relationship between the parents and allegations were made by both parents about each other. The children had also complained of the mother's conduct towards them.

The mother had been the primary carer of the children until 15 months ago when following a domestic incident the mother was asked by the local authority to leave the home and permit the father to take over their care. The father made an application for a residence order and the mother continued to have supervised contact with the children.

At a review hearing the judge, taking into account evidence from the local authority that should residence not be secured with the father care proceedings would be initiated, decided to continue the residence and contact arrangements and ordered that unless the mother brought an application in the following 12 months they would become final. Neither parent gave evidence and the judge refused to instruct a children's guardian or psychologist.

The mother appealed. The judge's decision not to appoint a further expert was one that was open to him. However, he had been overly pragmatic and not entirely fair to the mother in his acceptance of the father's allegations which were supported by the local authority. Further developments since that hearing meant that new allegations would need to be tested before the county court judge. The mother was now only seeking residence of the two younger children and would not contest the residence of the older two children. Appeal allowed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from