Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

RESIDENCE: Re K (Residence) [2012] EWCA Civ 1306

Sep 29, 2018, 18:33 PM
Slug : residence-re-k-residence-2012-ewca-civ-1306
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 16, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 100915

(Court of Appeal, Ward, Aikens, Black LJJ, 25 July 2012)

In proceedings in relation to four children aged 14, 13, 7 and 4 concerns were raised regarding the turbulent relationship between the parents and allegations were made by both parents about each other. The children had also complained of the mother's conduct towards them.

The mother had been the primary carer of the children until 15 months ago when following a domestic incident the mother was asked by the local authority to leave the home and permit the father to take over their care. The father made an application for a residence order and the mother continued to have supervised contact with the children.

At a review hearing the judge, taking into account evidence from the local authority that should residence not be secured with the father care proceedings would be initiated, decided to continue the residence and contact arrangements and ordered that unless the mother brought an application in the following 12 months they would become final. Neither parent gave evidence and the judge refused to instruct a children's guardian or psychologist.

The mother appealed. The judge's decision not to appoint a further expert was one that was open to him. However, he had been overly pragmatic and not entirely fair to the mother in his acceptance of the father's allegations which were supported by the local authority. Further developments since that hearing meant that new allegations would need to be tested before the county court judge. The mother was now only seeking residence of the two younger children and would not contest the residence of the older two children. Appeal allowed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from