Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

RESIDENCE: Re H (Contact Order)

Sep 29, 2018, 15:13 PM
Slug : residence-re-h-contact-order
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 19, 2010, 10:23 AM
Article ID : 84601

(Court of Appeal; Arden and Leveson LJJ and Sir Scott Baker;19 February 2010)

A couple separated shortly after birth of their disabled child and thereafter the mother was the sole carer of the baby. The father applied for contact and at the interim hearing the judge made a shared residence order, involving several episodes of contact with the father prior to the final hearing. The mother appealed.

The appeal was allowed. The judge had failed to take account of a number of important factors under the checklist. He had assumed that the father, a GP, had good parenting skills and had failed to give proper weight to the fact that the mother was the primary carer and was still breast feeding. The judge should have been concentrating on making an order that was as neutral as possible and that did not prejudice either side at the full hearing. The father was given two hours contact at a contact centre every two weeks, and two overnight stays per fortnight.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from