Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

RESIDENCE/JURISDICTION: Deticek v Sgueglia (Case C-403/09 PPU)

Sep 29, 2018, 15:13 PM
Slug : residence-jurisdiction-deticek-v-sgueglia-case-c-403-09-ppu
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 23, 2009, 10:31 AM
Article ID : 84613

(European Court of Justice; 23 December 2009)

The Slovenian mother and Italian father were married and lived in Italy. The Italian court provisionally granted sole custody to the father and placed the child in a children's home. The mother and child travelled to Slovenia where a court granted custody of the child to the mother, relying on a change of circumstances and the interests of child.

The ECJ considered Brussels II Revised regarding the scope of a state's jurisdiction. Held that the court of a member state in which the child was present could not provisionally grant custody of the child to one parent if a court of another member state, with jurisdiction as to substance of case, had already given custody to other parent.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from