Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

RELOCATION: Re TC and JC (Children: Relocation) [2013] EWHC 292 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:01 PM
Slug : relocation-re-tc-and-jc-children-relocation-2013-ewhc-292-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 5, 2013, 02:34 AM
Article ID : 101791

(Family Division, Mostyn J, 21 February 2013)

When the Australian mother and British father faced marriage difficulties the mother, without warning the father, took the two children, aged 2 and 3, and flew to Australia. Following Hague Convention proceedings in Australia the children were returned to this jurisdiction and were cared for under a shared care arrangement. The mother now sought permission to relocate.

The Cafcass officer was unable to provide a clear recommendation to the court and was unable to say where the balance lay. The parents agreed that whatever the outcome they would provide a shared care arrangement and the unsuccessful parent would relocate in order to do so.

In the circumstances the mother's capacity to meet the children's needs would be diminished if she were required to stay in the UK partly due to the complex immigration requirements and also due to her potential bankruptcy. Applying the guidance, the impact on the mother, if a decision favourable to the father were made, would bear far more heavily on her than the father in the alternative situation. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from