The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Meta Title :Reforming and modernising the family courts
Meta Keywords :Reforming and modernising the family courts
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Nov 12, 2018, 20:44 PM
Article ID :117494
Including experts in cases involving children and modernising the family courts are the key themes of a recent speech delivered by Lord Justice McFarlane, the judge responsible for the family justice system throughout England and Wales. Reforms such as introducing paperless hearings and virtual courts are among those hoped to progress family law in the near future.
Experts in cases relating to children
McFarlane explains that legal professionals, even those specialising in family courts, are not professionally qualified to ‘assess and advise upon matters of child development, children’s emotional well-being and, more generally, matters regarding a child’s welfare’.
Judges rely mainly on common sense and common knowledge in their decision-making, and ‘cases involving the welfare of children almost always require the input of a professional expert other than a lawyer or judge’, McFarlane continues.
Therefore, he says, it is a serious problem that courts are experience more and more difficulty finding experts who are prepared to take on instruction in a family case. Improving case-management and timetabling is less likely to disrupt experts’ plans and encourage them to participate in court hearings.
Paperless court proceedings
In a bid to improve efficiency and reliability, tribunals and family courts across the country will be moving to use digital bundles for court information, rather than the previous ring-binders. Mcfarlane suggests such a system will benefit experts:
‘For the expert the receipt of all the documents in the case in a WinZip file, rather than by DHL, and the ability to carry all of this material on a laptop, would seem to be a very clear advantage.’
Macfarlane welcomes the move to virtual courts as ‘an efficient, effective and economic way of conducting court business’, so long as the equipment is reliable and sufficiently sophisticated for the job.