Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re A, B and C (Children) [2021] EWCA Civ 451
(Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Macur, Baker, Arnold LJJ, 01 April 2021)Public Law Children – Fact finding – Lucas Direction – Sexual abuse allegations – Judge found...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
HMCTS launches updated online court and tribunal finder
HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has launched an updated version of its online court and tribunal finder tool to help those in search of a court, its location, opening times, disabled access...
NFJO publishes report on supervision orders in care proceedings
The Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (NFJO) has published a report following its survey into the use of supervision orders in care proceedings. The survey focused on...
Villiers - the Anglo/Scottish perspective
Heard by the Supreme Court in December 2019, with its judgment last July, this case attracted much interest (or “lurid publicity” as per Mr Justice Mostyn in his judgement this week) as it...
View all articles
Authors

Recurrent care proceedings: Part 2: Young motherhood and the role of the court (£)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:59 PM
family law, repeat care proceedings, Children and Vulnerable Witnesses Working Group, reforms
This is the second in a series aimed at stimulating a national conversation about recurrent public law proceedings.
Slug : recurrent-care-proceedings-part-2-young-motherhood-and-the-role-of-the-court
Meta Title : Recurrent care proceedings: Part 2: Young motherhood and the role of the court (£)
Meta Keywords : family law, repeat care proceedings, Children and Vulnerable Witnesses Working Group, reforms
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 10, 2014, 08:16 AM
Article ID : 107371
JUDITH HARWIN, Professor of Social Work, Brunel University

KAREN BROADHURST, Senior Lecturer in Socio-Legal Studies, University of Manchester

SOPHIE KERSHAW, Service Manager Family Drug and Alcohol Court

MIKE SHAW, Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Child and Family Department at the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust

BACHAR ALROUH, Research Fellow, Brunel University

CLAIRE MASON, Research Associate, University of Manchester, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust

This is the second in a series aimed at stimulating a national conversation about recurrent public law proceedings.


One of the most concerning findings of our recent feasibility study into the national scale and pattern of recurrent care proceedings was the young age of the mothers (Broadhurst et al, 2014: http://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/captu... Fifty per cent of all mothers caught up in a cycle of recurrent care proceedings were aged 24 or less at the time of the first application recorded in our observational window (2007–2013). Some of these mothers had been involved in not just two, but in multiple successive proceedings and, although the numbers were small, they also included those aged 14–19. This pattern prompts an immediate question. What can be done to help mothers break a pattern of recurrent care proceedings early in the maternal life course? In addition, we would add, what role might the court play with young mothers (and indeed fathers) vulnerable to a pattern of repeat removal of children? The recent Re B-S case ([2013] EWCA Civ 1146, [2014] 1 FLR 1035) and our own findings provide a catalyst to start a debate about the potential of the court to intercept the cycle of recurrence for young mothers and to identify some of the challenges and opportunities it faces in doing so. It is a debate that links well to the Interim Report of the Children and Vulnerable Witnesses Working Group – 31 July 2014 published in September [2014] Fam Law 1325 and the comments by the President of the Family Division in ‘13th View from the President’s Chambers: The process of reform: an update’ published in September [2014] Fam Law 1259.

There is a pressing need to consider what the court can do differently to address the needs of young mothers, as well as deciding on the child’s future. To explore this question we consider the potential of problem-solving courts and draw on our practice experience and research into the Family Drug and
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Family_Law
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from