Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New rules for legal practice: guidance for legal professionals
The Ministry of Justice has published a page on the gov.uk website bringing together guidance for legal professionals on the new rules for various areas of legal practice. The page can be found here....
Book Review on Cohabitation: Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)
It is 27 years since Denzil Lush first produced this book, some subsequent editions of which one has had the pleasure of reviewing for Family Law, and which, for some reason, does not figure as much...
Re AC (A Child) [2020] EWFC 90
(Family Court, Peel J, 11 December 2020)Private Law Children – s 8, Children Act 1989 – Inheritance - Jurisdiction Whether court had jurisdiction to authorise the mother to accept the...
Second reading in the House of Lords of the Domestic Abuse Bill
The Domestic Abuse Bill received its second reading in the House of Lords on 5 January 2021. The committee stage, where the bill will be scrutinised line-by-line, does not yet have a confirmed date....
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Recurrent care proceedings: Part 2: Young motherhood and the role of the court (£)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:59 PM
family law, repeat care proceedings, Children and Vulnerable Witnesses Working Group, reforms
This is the second in a series aimed at stimulating a national conversation about recurrent public law proceedings.
Slug : recurrent-care-proceedings-part-2-young-motherhood-and-the-role-of-the-court
Meta Title : Recurrent care proceedings: Part 2: Young motherhood and the role of the court (£)
Meta Keywords : family law, repeat care proceedings, Children and Vulnerable Witnesses Working Group, reforms
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 10, 2014, 08:16 AM
Article ID : 107371
JUDITH HARWIN, Professor of Social Work, Brunel University

KAREN BROADHURST, Senior Lecturer in Socio-Legal Studies, University of Manchester

SOPHIE KERSHAW, Service Manager Family Drug and Alcohol Court

MIKE SHAW, Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Child and Family Department at the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust

BACHAR ALROUH, Research Fellow, Brunel University

CLAIRE MASON, Research Associate, University of Manchester, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust

This is the second in a series aimed at stimulating a national conversation about recurrent public law proceedings.


One of the most concerning findings of our recent feasibility study into the national scale and pattern of recurrent care proceedings was the young age of the mothers (Broadhurst et al, 2014: http://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/captu... Fifty per cent of all mothers caught up in a cycle of recurrent care proceedings were aged 24 or less at the time of the first application recorded in our observational window (2007–2013). Some of these mothers had been involved in not just two, but in multiple successive proceedings and, although the numbers were small, they also included those aged 14–19. This pattern prompts an immediate question. What can be done to help mothers break a pattern of recurrent care proceedings early in the maternal life course? In addition, we would add, what role might the court play with young mothers (and indeed fathers) vulnerable to a pattern of repeat removal of children? The recent Re B-S case ([2013] EWCA Civ 1146, [2014] 1 FLR 1035) and our own findings provide a catalyst to start a debate about the potential of the court to intercept the cycle of recurrence for young mothers and to identify some of the challenges and opportunities it faces in doing so. It is a debate that links well to the Interim Report of the Children and Vulnerable Witnesses Working Group – 31 July 2014 published in September [2014] Fam Law 1325 and the comments by the President of the Family Division in ‘13th View from the President’s Chambers: The process of reform: an update’ published in September [2014] Fam Law 1259.

There is a pressing need to consider what the court can do differently to address the needs of young mothers, as well as deciding on the child’s future. To explore this question we consider the potential of problem-solving courts and draw on our practice experience and research into the Family Drug and
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Family_Law
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from