Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
CARE PROCEEDINGS:Re B (Transfer of Foster Placement)
Sep 29, 2018, 18:19 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Jul 20, 2012, 05:00 AM
Article ID :99531
(Family Division, HHJ Hunt, sitting as a deputy judge of the Family Division, 4 May 2012)
The six siblings were placed in three different foster homes for 6 months under interim care orders. The foster homes were a considerable distance from the family home, the school and from each other.
The local authority sought to move all six children to different foster homes that were in closer proximity to the family home. The guardians sought an injunction preventing a further move under s 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998. A psychologist report supported the guardians in particular in respect of two of the children.
Application refused. There were no grounds sufficient to prevent the local authority from moving the children.