Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Read v Panzone [2019] EWCA Civ 1662

Oct 23, 2019, 15:25 PM
Financial remedies – Disposition order – Best interests
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part. The court held that the way in which an avoidance of disposition order had come to be made amounted to a serious procedural irregularity.
Slug :
Meta Title : Read v Panzone [2019] EWCA Civ 1662
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Disposition order – Best interests
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 22, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Court of Appeal, King, Moylan and Leggatt LJJ, 9 October 2019)

Financial remedies – Disposition order – Best interests

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part. The court held that the way in which an avoidance of disposition order had come to be made amounted to a serious procedural irregularity.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWCA Civ 1662

Case No: B6/2018/3000

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM HIGH COURT, FAMILY DIVISION
Mr Justice Parker

ZC15D00585

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 09/10/2019

Before:

LADY JUSTICE KING
LORD JUSTICE MOYLAN and

LORD JUSTICE LEGGATT

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

ANNE READ
Appellant

- and -

(1) MELANIE PANZONE
(2) JONATHON READ
Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr Michael Horton (instructed by Advocate (Bar Pro Bono Unit)) for the Appellant
Mr Christopher Hames QC and Mr Harry Nosworthy (instructed by Ms Panzone) for the 1st Respondent
Mr Jonathan Evans (instructed by Mr Read) for the 2nd Respondent

Hearing date: 10th July 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

 

Judgment: Read v Panzone [2019] EWCA Civ 1662

 

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from