Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

Read v Panzone [2019] EWCA Civ 1662

Oct 23, 2019, 15:25 PM
Financial remedies – Disposition order – Best interests
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part. The court held that the way in which an avoidance of disposition order had come to be made amounted to a serious procedural irregularity.
Slug :
Meta Title : Read v Panzone [2019] EWCA Civ 1662
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Disposition order – Best interests
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 22, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Court of Appeal, King, Moylan and Leggatt LJJ, 9 October 2019)

Financial remedies – Disposition order – Best interests

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part. The court held that the way in which an avoidance of disposition order had come to be made amounted to a serious procedural irregularity.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWCA Civ 1662

Case No: B6/2018/3000

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM HIGH COURT, FAMILY DIVISION
Mr Justice Parker

ZC15D00585

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 09/10/2019

Before:

LADY JUSTICE KING
LORD JUSTICE MOYLAN and

LORD JUSTICE LEGGATT

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

ANNE READ
Appellant

- and -

(1) MELANIE PANZONE
(2) JONATHON READ
Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr Michael Horton (instructed by Advocate (Bar Pro Bono Unit)) for the Appellant
Mr Christopher Hames QC and Mr Harry Nosworthy (instructed by Ms Panzone) for the 1st Respondent
Mr Jonathan Evans (instructed by Mr Read) for the 2nd Respondent

Hearing date: 10th July 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

 

Judgment: Read v Panzone [2019] EWCA Civ 1662

 

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from