Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

Read v Panzone [2019] EWCA Civ 1662

Oct 23, 2019, 15:25 PM
Financial remedies – Disposition order – Best interests
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part. The court held that the way in which an avoidance of disposition order had come to be made amounted to a serious procedural irregularity.
Slug :
Meta Title : Read v Panzone [2019] EWCA Civ 1662
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Disposition order – Best interests
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 22, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Court of Appeal, King, Moylan and Leggatt LJJ, 9 October 2019)

Financial remedies – Disposition order – Best interests

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part. The court held that the way in which an avoidance of disposition order had come to be made amounted to a serious procedural irregularity.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWCA Civ 1662

Case No: B6/2018/3000

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM HIGH COURT, FAMILY DIVISION
Mr Justice Parker

ZC15D00585

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 09/10/2019

Before:

LADY JUSTICE KING
LORD JUSTICE MOYLAN and

LORD JUSTICE LEGGATT

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

ANNE READ
Appellant

- and -

(1) MELANIE PANZONE
(2) JONATHON READ
Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr Michael Horton (instructed by Advocate (Bar Pro Bono Unit)) for the Appellant
Mr Christopher Hames QC and Mr Harry Nosworthy (instructed by Ms Panzone) for the 1st Respondent
Mr Jonathan Evans (instructed by Mr Read) for the 2nd Respondent

Hearing date: 10th July 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

 

Judgment: Read v Panzone [2019] EWCA Civ 1662

 

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from