Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

Re X (Children)(No 3) [2015] EWHC 3651 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:47 PM
Public law children – Care proceedings – Allegations of the mother being a radical extremist – Mother attempted to remove children to Turkey – Fact-finding
The President concluded that the local authority had not proved its case in respect of allegations of the mother’s radical extremism and the children would be restored to the mother’s care.
Slug : re-x-children-no-3-2015-ewhc-3651-fam
Meta Title : Re X (Children)(No 3) [2015] EWHC 3651 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Care proceedings – Allegations of the mother being a radical extremist – Mother attempted to remove children to Turkey – Fact-finding
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 21, 2015, 07:52 AM
Article ID : 111221

(Family Division, Sir James Munby P, 16 December 2015)

Public law children – Care proceedings – Allegations of the mother being a radical extremist – Mother attempted to remove children to Turkey – Fact-finding

The President concluded that the local authority had not proved its case in respect of allegations of the mother’s radical extremism and the children would be restored to the mother’s care.

The mother of four children had attempted to take her family to Turkey when she was arrested at the airport along with the maternal aunt, uncle and grandmother. Emergency protection orders were granted and the children were placed with foster carers.

The local authority threshold statement listed a range of concerns including that the mother intended to travel to Syria to join with ISIS militants. Significant materials had been found at the mother’s home. The mother disputed that the threshold had been crossed and refuted the suggestion that she was a radical fundamentalist. However she shifted her position on several occasions and accepted that she had not been fully open and honest with professionals. She asserted that she had actually travelled to Turkey to meet and possibly marry a man which she claimed provided a reason for certain items being in her luggage.

The President found that there were two factors of particular importance pointing in opposite directions. The mother had not proved her case in respect of her intended marriage which meant that the only explanation she had proffered for the items being in her luggage fell away. The local authority had not proved that the material found at the mother’s home had the significance suggested or that she was a radical or extremist. Weighing all of the matters, although there remained suspicion about what the mother had been doing, the court was unable to conclude that the local authority had proved any part of its case and the children would be restored to the mother’s care.



This judgment was handed down in open court

Case numbers omitted

Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 3651 (Fam)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Civil and Family Justice Centre

Vernon Street

Liverpool



Date: 16 December 2015

Before:

SIR JAMES MUNBY PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

In the  matter of X (Children) (No 3)

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr  Simon J G Crabtree (instructed by the local authority) for local authority A

Mr Karl  Rowley QC (instructed by Stephensons Solicitors LLP) for MX (mother of X1, X2. X3, X4) 

Miss Ayeisha  Khandia (of Fountain Solicitors) for FX (father of X1, X2, X3, X4) 

Miss Linda Sweeney (instructed by AFG Law) for GX (the children’s guardian of X1, X2, X3, X4)

 

Hearing dates: 20-23 October 2015

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Judgment

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from