Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

Re X (Children)(No 3) [2015] EWHC 3651 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:47 PM
Public law children – Care proceedings – Allegations of the mother being a radical extremist – Mother attempted to remove children to Turkey – Fact-finding
The President concluded that the local authority had not proved its case in respect of allegations of the mother’s radical extremism and the children would be restored to the mother’s care.
Slug : re-x-children-no-3-2015-ewhc-3651-fam
Meta Title : Re X (Children)(No 3) [2015] EWHC 3651 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Care proceedings – Allegations of the mother being a radical extremist – Mother attempted to remove children to Turkey – Fact-finding
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 21, 2015, 07:52 AM
Article ID : 111221

(Family Division, Sir James Munby P, 16 December 2015)

Public law children – Care proceedings – Allegations of the mother being a radical extremist – Mother attempted to remove children to Turkey – Fact-finding

The President concluded that the local authority had not proved its case in respect of allegations of the mother’s radical extremism and the children would be restored to the mother’s care.

The mother of four children had attempted to take her family to Turkey when she was arrested at the airport along with the maternal aunt, uncle and grandmother. Emergency protection orders were granted and the children were placed with foster carers.

The local authority threshold statement listed a range of concerns including that the mother intended to travel to Syria to join with ISIS militants. Significant materials had been found at the mother’s home. The mother disputed that the threshold had been crossed and refuted the suggestion that she was a radical fundamentalist. However she shifted her position on several occasions and accepted that she had not been fully open and honest with professionals. She asserted that she had actually travelled to Turkey to meet and possibly marry a man which she claimed provided a reason for certain items being in her luggage.

The President found that there were two factors of particular importance pointing in opposite directions. The mother had not proved her case in respect of her intended marriage which meant that the only explanation she had proffered for the items being in her luggage fell away. The local authority had not proved that the material found at the mother’s home had the significance suggested or that she was a radical or extremist. Weighing all of the matters, although there remained suspicion about what the mother had been doing, the court was unable to conclude that the local authority had proved any part of its case and the children would be restored to the mother’s care.



This judgment was handed down in open court

Case numbers omitted

Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 3651 (Fam)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Civil and Family Justice Centre

Vernon Street

Liverpool



Date: 16 December 2015

Before:

SIR JAMES MUNBY PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

In the  matter of X (Children) (No 3)

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr  Simon J G Crabtree (instructed by the local authority) for local authority A

Mr Karl  Rowley QC (instructed by Stephensons Solicitors LLP) for MX (mother of X1, X2. X3, X4) 

Miss Ayeisha  Khandia (of Fountain Solicitors) for FX (father of X1, X2, X3, X4) 

Miss Linda Sweeney (instructed by AFG Law) for GX (the children’s guardian of X1, X2, X3, X4)

 

Hearing dates: 20-23 October 2015

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Judgment

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from