Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
The President held that the English court did not have jurisdiction to make a secure accommodation order for placement of a child in Scotland.
Meta Title :Re X and Y  EWHC 2271 (Fam)
Meta Keywords :Public law children – Secure accommodation – Jurisdiction – Placement of child in Scotland
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Sep 21, 2016, 07:48 AM
Article ID :114546
(Family Division, Sir James Munby, the President of the Family Division, 12 September 2016)
Public law children – Secure accommodation – Jurisdiction – Placement of child in Scotland The President held that the English court did not have jurisdiction to make a secure accommodation order for placement of a child in Scotland.
X and Y, who were 16 and 15 respectively, were subject to care proceedings. When their behaviour deteriorated applications were made to place them in secure accommodation. No places were available in England and, therefore, the applications were for placement in Scotland. It fell to be determined whether a judge sitting in England could make an order under s 25 of the Children Act 1989 for a child to be placed in a unit in Scotland. If not, whether the court could exercise the inherent parens patriae jurisdiction of the High Court. In either case, the question arose of whether such an order could be recognised and enforced in Scotland.
The President held that a judge in England could not make an order under s 25 for the child to be placed in Scotland. However, in principle, a judge could exercise the inherent jurisdiction and order the placement of a child in secure accommodation in Scotland providing the substantive and procedural requirements of Art 5 of the European Convention were complied with.
It was clear that none of the legislative provision provided for the recognition and enforcement in Scotland of an order made by a judge sitting in England under the inherent parents patriae jurisdiction.
In the circumstances of this case, the only option was for an application to be made by the relevant local authorities to the Scottish Court of Sessions seeking to invoke the nobile officium. Following a decision, the matter could be listed again to determine what should be done in light of the Scottish court's decision. Neutral Citation Number:  EWHC 2271 (Fam) Case numbers omitted