Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: Re T (Placement Order) [2008] EWCA Civ 542

Sep 29, 2018, 17:07 PM
Slug : re-t-placement-order-2008-ewca-civ-542
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 19, 2008, 06:45 AM
Article ID : 86875

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Hughes LJJ; 19 March 2008)

In relation to two very disturbed children who lacked the ability to engage with others, the professionals recommended a specialist therapeutic foster placement for at least 6 months before a decision was reached as to their long-term placement. The authority plan was for adoption if possible. The judge granted placement orders with a view to eventual adoption of the children, to give the authority the greatest possible certainty and flexibility.

Allowing the appeal and setting aside the placement orders, adoption might be in the best interests of a child even if there was a real possibility that an adoptive placement would not be found, but in this case the judge's finding that adoption was in the children's best interests had been premature. These children had not been suitable for placement for adoption at the time the placement orders had been made, and it had not been known if they ever would be until after several months' placement with specialist foster-carers.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from