Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

CARE: Re T and Re C (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:37 PM
Slug : re-t-and-re-c-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 10, 2007, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88907

(Family Division; 10 December 2007; Mr Jeremy Richardson QC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge))

Removing the two children from the care of a mother whose learning disabilities meant that she was unable to parent satisfactorily, the court reviewed the law in this area, and noted that it was not the case that a parent with special needs or a learning disability could never adequately look after a child or children. Unfortunately, in this case the children had suffered significant harm as a result of the care given by the mother, and would suffer such harm in the future if left in the sole care of the mother. With support the mother had learned to provide an adequate physical home environment for the children, but she had little or no comprehension of their emotional needs and feelings.In other cases a parent might be able to be supported so that the child could stay with them, but in this case support had not prevented harm, and it was not possible to identify a realistic package of support that would enable the children to remain with the mother.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from