Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION: Re T (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2008] EWHC 809 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:31 PM
Slug : re-t-abduction-rights-of-custody-2008-ewhc-809-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 5, 2008, 10:33 AM
Article ID : 88065

(Family Division; Coleridge J; 17 March 2008)

The issue whether the father had rights of custody in Oregon, the jurisdiction of habitual residence, was one that was apt to be heard in Oregon, provided the mother was able to be fully represented at the Oregon hearing. The Legal Services Commission was urged to reconsider urgently their decision that they did not have to fund the mother's representation before the Oregon court. The proceedings were not foreign proceedings within Access to Justice Act 1999, s 19, they were English proceedings under the Hague Convention; from time to time issues in such proceedings had to be determined abroad, under Art 15 of the Hague Convention. It would be very strange indeed if a vital issue like the one before the court could not be properly determined because one party could not be represented before the foreign court. If it turned out that the Legal Services Commission would not fund the litigation, and there was no other source from which the mother could fund the litigation before the Oregon court, the matter would have to be determined in a second best way by an English judge.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from