Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION/CARE: Re S (Special Guardianship Order) (No 2) [2007] EWCA Civ 90

Sep 29, 2018, 17:32 PM
Slug : re-s-special-guardianship-order-no-2-2007-ewca-civ-90
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 20, 2007, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88191

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Tuckey and Wall LLJ; 14 February 2007)

In an addendum to the judgment in Re S (Special Guardianship) [2007] EWCA Civ 54 (see below), the court clarified the need for reports under s 14A(8) Children Act 1989 when making special guardianship orders: the court could not make such an order of its own motion without having received a s 14A(8) report. Reports containing relevant information (such as adoption application reports) could not be relied upon in the absence of a s 14A(8) report. Where the court considered that a special guardianship order should be made, even though no application for such an order had been made by any of the parties and there was no report under s 14A(8), the court should exercise its powers under s 14A(9) and request the authority to conduct the investigation and produce such a report. The court could, however, adopt a pragmatic approach to the report; when the bulk of the information required for the report under s 14A(8) was already before the court in a different form it would be unduly burdensome to require the local authority to start again from scratch. If much of the relevant information was already before the court, the local authority should then be asked to file a report which would fulfil the terms of s 14A(8) by (i) providing any missing information, and (ii) by setting out the remaining information in the form of cross-references to the information already before the court in other reports.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from