Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION/CARE: Re S (Special Guardianship Order) (No 2) [2007] EWCA Civ 90

Sep 29, 2018, 17:32 PM
Slug : re-s-special-guardianship-order-no-2-2007-ewca-civ-90
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 20, 2007, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88191

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Tuckey and Wall LLJ; 14 February 2007)

In an addendum to the judgment in Re S (Special Guardianship) [2007] EWCA Civ 54 (see below), the court clarified the need for reports under s 14A(8) Children Act 1989 when making special guardianship orders: the court could not make such an order of its own motion without having received a s 14A(8) report. Reports containing relevant information (such as adoption application reports) could not be relied upon in the absence of a s 14A(8) report. Where the court considered that a special guardianship order should be made, even though no application for such an order had been made by any of the parties and there was no report under s 14A(8), the court should exercise its powers under s 14A(9) and request the authority to conduct the investigation and produce such a report. The court could, however, adopt a pragmatic approach to the report; when the bulk of the information required for the report under s 14A(8) was already before the court in a different form it would be unduly burdensome to require the local authority to start again from scratch. If much of the relevant information was already before the court, the local authority should then be asked to file a report which would fulfil the terms of s 14A(8) by (i) providing any missing information, and (ii) by setting out the remaining information in the form of cross-references to the information already before the court in other reports.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from