Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
Emotional harm and interim removal: how psychological thinking can support practice
Dr Ben Laskey ClinPsyD, AFBPS, Consultant Clinical Psychologist, The Psychology PartnershipGeorge Butler, Barrister at Law, 42 Bedford Row ChambersThe family courts are full of cases involving...
Decision making, mental capacity and undue influence: do hard cases make bad – or least fuzzy-edged law?
David Lock QC, Landmark ChambersThis article asks the question – should the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court be used to place restrictions on the life choices of individuals with capacity...
Family law leaves the EU: the UK family law landscape on New Year’s Day 2021
The UK family law landscape will be very different on 1 January 2021 compared to any time over the past two decades, after Brussels II in March 2001. Cases with any EU connection will be in two...
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
View all articles

Re S (Findings of Fact: Honour-Based Violence) [2013] EWHC 15 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:40 PM
Slug : re-s-findings-of-fact-honour-based-violence-2013-ewhc-15-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 30, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 101515

(Family Division, Peter Jackson J, 14 January 2013)

The mother and father were cousins, who originated from Pakistan. The mother and three children had been moved to an unknown location following the mother's serious allegations against the father and his family of physical, sexual and emotional abuse. She also believed the paternal family were responsible for the death of her cousin and her first born child but no dependable evidence existed to support this belief.

The paternal family denied the allegations and claimed the mother was in a relationship with a drug dealer by whom she had a fourth child. The mother gave false evidence to the court claiming the child was born as a result of a one night stand and that she had no further relationship with the man. However, the mother gave evidence that conflicted with that assertion at the man's criminal trial. During the fact-finding hearing the mother claimed she lied to the court because she feared for the safety of herself and her child.

The judge found that the mother's deception regarding her relationship was deplorable and made it harder for the court to determine the truth. However, her other allegations were not undermined by this, taking into account all the evidence. Her explanation that she was trying to protect herself and her children was credible given the history.

On the balance of probabilities the mother's allegations, excluding those in relation to her cousin and first born child, were made out.



Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from