Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

PATERNITY: Re R (IVF: Paternity of Child) [2005] UKHL 33

Sep 29, 2018, 17:21 PM
Slug : re-r-ivf-paternity-of-child-2005-ukhl-33
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 12, 2005, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 86081

(12 May 2005; Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Steyn, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Hope of Craighead and Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe; House of Lords) [2005] 2 FLR 843, [2005] The Times May 12

The mother and her unmarried male partner sought fertility treatment involving donor sperm and the man signed a 'male partner's acknowledgement', acknowledging that he intended to become the legal father of any resulting child. By the time the treatment had resulted in a pregnancy, the couple had separated, although the mother had concealed this from the fertility centre in order to continue with the treatment. When the child was born, the man obtained a declaration of paternity, but the Court of Appeal allowed the mother's appeal. Adopting the reasoning and conclusions of the Court of Appeal, the House of Lords held that in conferring the relationship of parent and child on people who were related neither by blood nor marriage the rules must be applied very strictly. If, as in this case, the 'joint enterprise' of fertility treatment had ended by the time the successful treatment had begun, because by that stage the consenting couple had separated, the man was not the legal father of the resulting child.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from