Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Re R (Closed Material Procedure: Special Advocates: Funding) [2017] EWHC 1793 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:09 PM
Costs – Closed material procedure – Special advocate – Funding
The police were directed to fund the use of a special advocate instructed on behalf of the father.
Slug : re-r-closed-material-procedure-special-advocates-funding-2017-ewhc-1793-fam
Meta Title : Re R (Closed Material Procedure: Special Advocates: Funding) [2017] EWHC 1793 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Costs – Closed material procedure – Special advocate – Funding
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 18, 2017, 04:58 AM
Article ID : 114313

(Family Division, Cobb J, 13 July 2017)

Costs – Closed material procedure – Special advocate – Funding

The police were directed to fund the use of a special advocate instructed on behalf of the father.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 1793 (Fam)

Case No: CM15C02520
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 13/07/2017

Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE COBB

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re R (Closed Material Procedure: Special Advocates: Funding)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Alison Ball QC and Matthew Fletcher for the Local Authority
Janet Bazley QC and Sharon Segal for the Mother
Mukul Chawla QC and Tom Bullmore (Mr. Bullmore from the Special Advocates’ Support Office) Special Advocate for the Mother in the closed proceedings
Ian Bugg for the Father
Ashley Underwood QC (instructed by Nicola Margiotta at the Special Advocates’ Support Office) proposed Special Advocate for the Father in the closed proceedings
Jeremy Johnson QC (instructed by the Head of Legal Services) for the relevant Police Constabulary 
Doushka Krish for the Children’s Guardian of R
David Martin from the Ministry of Justice who submitted correspondence but did not appear at the hearing 
The identities of the instructing solicitors in the Part IV CA 1989 proceedings have been omitted in the interests of preserving confidentiality.

Hearing dates: 12 June 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved 

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


Judgment:
 Re R (Closed Material Procedure Special Advocates Funding) [2017] EWHC 1793 (Fam).rtf


Categories :
  • Costs
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from