Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Re R (A Child: Appeal: Termination of Contact) [2019] EWHC 132 (Fam)

Feb 27, 2019, 15:24 PM
Private law children – Contact – Termination – Appeal
The father’s appeal was allowed in part, the order for indirect contact was continued and the s 91(14) order was discharged.
Slug :
Meta Title : Re R (A Child: Appeal: Termination of Contact) [2019] EWHC 132 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Contact – Termination – Appeal
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 27, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Williams J, 29 January 2019)

Private law children – Contact – Termination – Appeal

The father’s appeal was allowed in part, the order for indirect contact was continued and the s 91(14) order was discharged.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 132 (Fam)

Case No: 2018/0134

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 29/01/2019

 

Before :
MR JUSTICE WILLIAMS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

ME
Applicant

- and -

MP
1st Respondent

- and -
R
(Through his Children’s Guardian Samantha Ryall)

2nd Respondent

(Appeal: Termination of Contact)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Nasstassia Hylton (instructed as Direct Access Counsel Pro Bono) for the Applicant
Richard Egleton (instructed as Direct Access Counsel Pro Bono) for the 1st Respondent
Katie Phillips (instructed by Harney & Wells) for the 2nd Respondent

Hearing dates: 11 December 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to FPR 27.9 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE WILLIAMS

 

Judgment: Re R (A Child: Appeal: Termination of Contact) [2019] EWHC 132

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from