Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Re R (A Child: Appeal: Termination of Contact) [2019] EWHC 132 (Fam)

Feb 27, 2019, 15:24 PM
Private law children – Contact – Termination – Appeal
The father’s appeal was allowed in part, the order for indirect contact was continued and the s 91(14) order was discharged.
Slug :
Meta Title : Re R (A Child: Appeal: Termination of Contact) [2019] EWHC 132 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Contact – Termination – Appeal
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 27, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Williams J, 29 January 2019)

Private law children – Contact – Termination – Appeal

The father’s appeal was allowed in part, the order for indirect contact was continued and the s 91(14) order was discharged.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 132 (Fam)

Case No: 2018/0134

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 29/01/2019

 

Before :
MR JUSTICE WILLIAMS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

ME
Applicant

- and -

MP
1st Respondent

- and -
R
(Through his Children’s Guardian Samantha Ryall)

2nd Respondent

(Appeal: Termination of Contact)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Nasstassia Hylton (instructed as Direct Access Counsel Pro Bono) for the Applicant
Richard Egleton (instructed as Direct Access Counsel Pro Bono) for the 1st Respondent
Katie Phillips (instructed by Harney & Wells) for the 2nd Respondent

Hearing dates: 11 December 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to FPR 27.9 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE WILLIAMS

 

Judgment: Re R (A Child: Appeal: Termination of Contact) [2019] EWHC 132

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from