Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

Re Q (Child - Interim Care Order - Jurisdiction) [2019] EWHC 512 (Fam)

Mar 13, 2019, 11:31 AM
Public law children – Interim care order – Child approaching 17 – Effect of s 38(4) of the Children Act 1989
The court held that an interim care order or supervision order would cease to have effect on the child’s 17th birthday.
Slug :
Meta Title : Re Q (Child - Interim Care Order - Jurisdiction) [2019] EWHC 512 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Interim care order – Child approaching 17 – Effect of s 38(4) of the Children Act 1989
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 13, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Knowles J, 7 March 2019)

Public law children – Interim care order – Child approaching 17 – Effect of s 38(4) of the Children Act 1989

The court held that an interim care order or supervision order would cease to have effect on the child’s 17th birthday.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 512 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 07/03/2019

Before:

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE KNOWLES

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re Q (Child: Interim Care Order: Jurisdiction)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Edward Devereux QC and Ben Mansfield for the local authority
Damian Woodward-Carlton instructed by Burke Niazi Solicitors for the mother
Chris Barnes instructed by ITN Solicitors for the father
Martin Kingerley for Q

Brendan Roche for the Children’s Guardian

Hearing date: 28 February 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE KNOWLES DBE

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: Re Q (Child: Interim Care Order: Jurisdiction) [2019] EWHC 512 (Fam)

 

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from