Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Re Q (Child - Interim Care Order - Jurisdiction) [2019] EWHC 512 (Fam)

Mar 13, 2019, 11:31 AM
Public law children – Interim care order – Child approaching 17 – Effect of s 38(4) of the Children Act 1989
The court held that an interim care order or supervision order would cease to have effect on the child’s 17th birthday.
Slug :
Meta Title : Re Q (Child - Interim Care Order - Jurisdiction) [2019] EWHC 512 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Interim care order – Child approaching 17 – Effect of s 38(4) of the Children Act 1989
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 13, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Knowles J, 7 March 2019)

Public law children – Interim care order – Child approaching 17 – Effect of s 38(4) of the Children Act 1989

The court held that an interim care order or supervision order would cease to have effect on the child’s 17th birthday.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 512 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 07/03/2019

Before:

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE KNOWLES

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re Q (Child: Interim Care Order: Jurisdiction)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Edward Devereux QC and Ben Mansfield for the local authority
Damian Woodward-Carlton instructed by Burke Niazi Solicitors for the mother
Chris Barnes instructed by ITN Solicitors for the father
Martin Kingerley for Q

Brendan Roche for the Children’s Guardian

Hearing date: 28 February 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE KNOWLES DBE

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: Re Q (Child: Interim Care Order: Jurisdiction) [2019] EWHC 512 (Fam)

 

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from