Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Re Q (A Child) (DOLS: Lack of Secure Placement) [2021] EWHC 123 (Fam)

Feb 4, 2021, 17:48 PM
Public law children - Deprivation of liberty – Lack of secure accommodation – Authorisation sought for non-secure placement
Authorisation was granted for the deprivation of liberty of a 16-year-old.
Slug :
Meta Title : Re Q (A Child) (DOLS: Lack of Secure Placement) [2021] EWHC 123 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public law children - Deprivation of liberty – Lack of secure accommodation – Authorisation sought for non-secure placement
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 4, 2021, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Knowles J, 27 January 2021)

Public law children - Deprivation of liberty – Lack of secure accommodation – Authorisation sought for non-secure placement

Authorisation was granted for the deprivation of liberty of a 16-year-old.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 

 



Neutral Citation Number: [2021] EWHC 123 (Fam)


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 27/01/2021

Before :

MRS JUSTICE KNOWLES

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

A CITY COUNCIL
Applicant

- and -

X

and

Y

and

Q

(A Child)

and

The Children’s Guardian
Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Q (A Child) (DOLS: Lack of Secure Placement)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Miss Kirstie Danton for the local authority
Mr Oliver Lycett for Q
The Children’s Guardian represented himself
X was present but unrepresented
Y was neither present nor represented


Hearing date: 18 January 2021

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


Judgment: Re Q (A Child)(DOLS Lack of Secure Placement) [2021] EWHC 123 (Fam)

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from