Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

CONTACT: Re P (Contact) [2008] EWCA Civ 1431

Sep 29, 2018, 17:36 PM
Slug : re-p-contact-2008-ewca-civ-1431
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 8, 2009, 08:35 AM
Article ID : 88647

(Court of Appeal; Ward and Stanley Burnton LJJ and Sir William Aldous; 12 November 2008)

Following the couple's separation there were protracted proceedings concerning the children's residence and the contact arrangements. At a fact-finding hearing the judge found that there had been domestic violence by the father, but also that this was a father who 'could offer so much to his children'. Direct contact was ordered, but after a dispute between the parents, to which the police were called, contact lapsed for a while before resuming at a contact centre. Eventually the trial judge found that the children were so worried about unsupervised contact with the father that they wanted to end direct contact with him. The judge made orders providing for indirect contact, but commented that counselling would be helpful, and that he would be willing to hear submissions about that route and amend his order if necessary. The father appealed.

The court was concerned that the true underlying issue had not been fully or properly dealt with; the court could not be satisfied that the judge had grappled with all the alternatives open to him, the most obvious of which was to explore fully the possibility of the couple undertaking some form of counselling.The judge should not have made the order until he had heard submissions concerning counselling. The matter should be reheard.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from