Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: Re P (Adoption: Unmarried Couple) [2008] UKHL 38, [2008] The Times June 23

Sep 29, 2018, 17:28 PM
(House of Lords; Lord Hoffmann, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond and Lord Mance; 18 June 2008)
Slug : re-p-adoption-unmarried-couple-2008-ukhl-38-2008-the-times-june-23
Meta Title : ADOPTION: Re P (Adoption: Unmarried Couple) [2008] UKHL 38, [2008] The Times June 23
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 25, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 86717

(House of Lords; Lord Hoffmann, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond and Lord Mance; 18 June 2008)

Northern Ireland regulations preventing the consideration of an unmarried couple as potential adoptive parents breached the couple's right to respect for family life under European Convention on Human Rights, Art 8. If it were rational to adopt a 'bright line rule' to determine what class of people should adopt children, there would be much to be said for identifying married people as the best people to adopt children. However, such a 'bright line rule' was quite irrational, because the law required the interests of each child to be examined on a case-by-case basis. The fact that a couple did not wish to undertake the obligations of marriage was a factor to be considered by the court in assessing the likely stability of their relationship and its impact upon the long term welfare of the child, but this could not rationally be elevated into an irrebuttable presumption of unsuitability.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from