Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: Re P (Adoption: Unmarried Couple) [2008] UKHL 38, [2008] The Times June 23

Sep 29, 2018, 17:28 PM
(House of Lords; Lord Hoffmann, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond and Lord Mance; 18 June 2008)
Slug : re-p-adoption-unmarried-couple-2008-ukhl-38-2008-the-times-june-23
Meta Title : ADOPTION: Re P (Adoption: Unmarried Couple) [2008] UKHL 38, [2008] The Times June 23
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 25, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 86717

(House of Lords; Lord Hoffmann, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond and Lord Mance; 18 June 2008)

Northern Ireland regulations preventing the consideration of an unmarried couple as potential adoptive parents breached the couple's right to respect for family life under European Convention on Human Rights, Art 8. If it were rational to adopt a 'bright line rule' to determine what class of people should adopt children, there would be much to be said for identifying married people as the best people to adopt children. However, such a 'bright line rule' was quite irrational, because the law required the interests of each child to be examined on a case-by-case basis. The fact that a couple did not wish to undertake the obligations of marriage was a factor to be considered by the court in assessing the likely stability of their relationship and its impact upon the long term welfare of the child, but this could not rationally be elevated into an irrebuttable presumption of unsuitability.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from