Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
View all articles
Authors

Re N-S (Children) [2017] EWCA Civ 1121

Sep 29, 2018, 21:11 PM
Public law children – Adoption – Reasoning – Whether judge’s reasoning was deficient in analysis of why adoption was favoured over long-term fostering
The appeal from care and placement orders was dismissed.
Slug : re-n-s-children-2017-ewca-civ-1121
Meta Title : Re N-S (Children) [2017] EWCA Civ 1121
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Adoption – Reasoning – Whether judge’s reasoning was deficient in analysis of why adoption was favoured over long-term fostering
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 1, 2017, 08:57 AM
Article ID : 114369

(Court of Appeal, Sir James Munby P, McFarlane, Lewison LJJ, 25 July 2017)


Public law children – Adoption – Reasoning – Whether judge’s reasoning was deficient in analysis of why adoption was favoured over long-term fostering

 
The appeal from care and placement orders was dismissed.



For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 


Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 1121
Case No: B4/2017/0238/CCFMF

ON APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT SITTING AT WATFORD
HIS HONOUR JUDGE WILDING
WD1600101

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 25 July 2017

Before:

THE PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION
LORD JUSTICE McFARLANE
and
LORD JUSTICE LEWISON
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

Re N-S (Children)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Elizabeth Isaacs QC and Hilary Pollock (instructed by Hecht Montgomery Solicitors) for the Appellant Father
Mark Twomey QC and John Church (instructed by Hertfordshire County Council) for the First Respondent Local Authority
Matthew Stott (instructed by Reeds Solicitors) for the Children’s Guardian

Hearing date : 29 June 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment Approved 

Judgment: Re N-S (Children) [2017] EWCA Civ 1121.rtf


Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from