Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

Re N-S (Children) [2017] EWCA Civ 1121

Sep 29, 2018, 21:11 PM
Public law children – Adoption – Reasoning – Whether judge’s reasoning was deficient in analysis of why adoption was favoured over long-term fostering
The appeal from care and placement orders was dismissed.
Slug : re-n-s-children-2017-ewca-civ-1121
Meta Title : Re N-S (Children) [2017] EWCA Civ 1121
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Adoption – Reasoning – Whether judge’s reasoning was deficient in analysis of why adoption was favoured over long-term fostering
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 1, 2017, 08:57 AM
Article ID : 114369

(Court of Appeal, Sir James Munby P, McFarlane, Lewison LJJ, 25 July 2017)


Public law children – Adoption – Reasoning – Whether judge’s reasoning was deficient in analysis of why adoption was favoured over long-term fostering

 
The appeal from care and placement orders was dismissed.



For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 


Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 1121
Case No: B4/2017/0238/CCFMF

ON APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT SITTING AT WATFORD
HIS HONOUR JUDGE WILDING
WD1600101

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 25 July 2017

Before:

THE PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION
LORD JUSTICE McFARLANE
and
LORD JUSTICE LEWISON
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

Re N-S (Children)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Elizabeth Isaacs QC and Hilary Pollock (instructed by Hecht Montgomery Solicitors) for the Appellant Father
Mark Twomey QC and John Church (instructed by Hertfordshire County Council) for the First Respondent Local Authority
Matthew Stott (instructed by Reeds Solicitors) for the Children’s Guardian

Hearing date : 29 June 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment Approved 

Judgment: Re N-S (Children) [2017] EWCA Civ 1121.rtf


Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from