Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Re N; Re Children Act 1989, s 8; A v G [2008] EWHC 2042 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:11 PM
Slug : re-n-re-children-act-1989-s-8-a-v-g-2008-ewhc-2042-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 20, 2008, 09:40 AM
Article ID : 87197

(Family Division; Munby J; 20 August 2008)

A McKenzie friend did not have a right of audience and the court's discretion to grant a McKenzie friend a right of audience was to be granted 'only . . . for good reason' and in the light of and bearing in mind the 'general objective' set out in Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s 17(1) and the 'general principle' set out in s 17(3). Moreover, the court should be 'very slow' to grant a McKenzie friend a right of audience. However, that did not mean that, as a general principle, a right of audience could be granted only in 'exceptional circumstances'. All would depend on the circumstances. The overriding objective was that the courts should do justice. The court had to bear in mind that legal aid was not as readily available as readily as it had been in the past. There would be occasions when the grant of rights of audience to a McKenzie friend would be of advantage to the court in ensuring the litigant in person received a fair hearing, and it would sometimes be essential if justice were to be done and, equally importantly, perceived by the litigant in person as having been done.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from