Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Re M (Republic of Ireland) (Child's Objections) (Joinder of Children as Parties to Appeal) [2015] EWCA Civ 26

Sep 29, 2018, 22:28 PM
The mother’s appeal from a return order was allowed and the Court of Appeal found that the children did object to a return and that a return order should not be granted.
Slug : re-m-republic-of-ireland-child-s-objections-joinder-of-children-as-parties-to-appeal-2015-ewca-civ-26
Meta Title : Re M (Republic of Ireland) (Child's Objections) (Joinder of Children as Parties to Appeal) [2015] EWCA Civ 26
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 30, 2015, 11:01 AM
Article ID : 116578
(Court of Appeal, Richards, Black, Ryder LJJ, 27 January 2015)

[The judically approved judgment and accompanying headnote has now published in Family Law Reports [2015] 2 FLR 1074]

 Abduction – Child’s objections – Joinder of parties to appeal – Whether the objections were made out – Whether the children could be joined to the appeal proceedings
 
Please see attached file below for the full judgment.


  The mother’s appeal from a return order was allowed and the Court of Appeal found that the children did object to a return and that a return order should not be granted.

 The parents lived with their four children in Southern Ireland prior to their separation. The mother was the primary carer and the father provided financially for the family. In 2014 when the parents separated the mother took the children to England without warning the father.

 The mother accepted she had wrongfully removed the children for the purposes of Art 3 of the Hague Convention and she made allegations of domestic abuse against the father. The father sought the return of the children to Ireland and the mother resisted the application on the basis of the children’s objections and a grave risk of harm.

 The judge found that the mother had not made out her defence of a grave risk of harm and had failed to provide clear and compelling evidence. The judge found that the children were not objecting in a Hague Convention sense and that they had failed to appreciate the protective measures that could be put in place. A return order was granted.

 The mother appealed. The determination on the children’s objections would be set aside. A finding would be substituted that the older three children all objected to a return. The judge had erred in finding the children’s objections had not been made out when the Cafcass officer had clearly found that they had. Whether or not the children could separate their feelings about their father from their feelings regarding a return to Ireland might be relevant at the discretion stage of the application but it was not relevant at the gateway stage that the judge was considering.

 Weighing all of the relevant evidence there were strong reasons to exercise the discretion not to order a return of the children to Ireland, particularly in relation to the oldest child.

 It was imperative that in Hague Convention cases consideration was given at the earliest possible stage as to whether the appropriate parties were before the court. In this instance no consideration was given to whether the children should be joined as parties until after judgment was given. There was no reason why regard should not be had to Practice Direction 16A of the FPR in considering the issue of joinder in Hague Convention proceedings.

 An application for children to be joined as parties to proceedings at the appeal stage would not always be received sympathetically. Consideration should be given at the outset of proceedings. By the time the matter reached the Court of Appeal it was usually far too late to be considering such an application.

  Case No: B4/2014/2445, 2447 & 2499
 Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWCA Civ 26

 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
 ON APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT (PRINCIPAL REGISTRY)
 MRS JUSTICE ROBERTS  FD14P00628

 Royal Courts of Justice
 Strand
 London
 WC2A 2LL

 Date: 27/01/2015

 
 
Before :

 LORD JUSTICE RICHARDS
 LADY JUSTICE BLACK
 and
 LORD JUSTICE RYDER

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 RE M (REPUBLIC OF IRELAND) (CHILD’S OBJECTIONS) (JOINDER OF CHILDREN AS PARTIES TO APPEAL)

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Mr Christopher Hames & Ms Dorothea Gartland (instructed by Freemans) for the 1st & 2nd Appellants
 Ms Ruth Kirby (instructed By Co-operative Legal Services) for the 3rd Appellant Mr James Turner QC & Ms Mehvish Chaudhry (instructed by Williscroft & Co) for the Respondent

 Hearing dates: 4th & 5th November 2014

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 

 Judgment

 Re M (Republic of Ireland) (Child's Objections) (Joinder of Children as Parties to Appeal) [2015] EWCA Civ 26 
Categories :
  • Abduction
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from