Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
CONTEMPT: Re M (Contact Order)  EWCA Civ 615
Oct 27, 2018, 06:41 AM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
May 10, 2005, 08:41 AM
Article ID :88503
(Court of Appeal, Ward and Clarke LJJ, 11 April 2005)  2 FLR 1006
Held that the judge had erred in principle. A custodial sentence should not have been imposed until the judge was satisfied that such was justified. A custodial sentence ought not to be imposed simply because the father lacked the means to pay a fine. See also Re M (Contact Order)  EWCA 615 below in Newswatch cases under the heading Contempt". See September  Fam Law 694 for the case report and comment.