Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Re M (Children) [2017] EWCA Civ 2164

Sep 29, 2018, 22:01 PM
Private law children – Contact – Transgender father – Ultra-Orthodox Jewish family – Refusal to order direct contact - Appeal
The transgender father’s appeal from a decision declining direct contact with his Ultra-Orthodox Jewish children was allowed.
Slug : re-m-children-2017-ewca-civ-2164
Meta Title : Re M (Children) [2017] EWCA Civ 2164
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Contact – Transgender father – Ultra-Orthodox Jewish family – Refusal to order direct contact - Appeal
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 3, 2018, 09:37 AM
Article ID : 116259

(Court of Appeal, Sir James Munby, the President of the Family Division, Arden, Singh LJJ, 20 December 2017)

Private law children – Contact – Transgender father – Ultra-Orthodox Jewish family – Refusal to order direct contact - Appeal

The transgender father’s appeal from a decision declining direct contact with his Ultra-Orthodox Jewish children was allowed.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Case No: B4/2017/0571

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 2164
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT
Sitting at Manchester
Mr JUSTICE PETER JACKSON
[2017] EWFC 4
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 20 December 2017
Before :

SIR JAMES MUNBY PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION
LADY JUSTICE ARDEN
and
LORD JUSTICE SINGH

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

In the matter of M (Children)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ms Alison Ball QC and Mr Hassan Khan (instructed by Dawson Cornwell) for the appellant father
Mr Peter Buckley (instructed by Steinbergs Solicitors) for the respondent mother
Ms Frances Heaton QC and Ms Jane Walker (instructed by Alfred Newton Solicitors) for the children’s guardian
Ms Karon Monaghan QC and Ms Sarah Hannett (instructed by Baker & McKenzie LLP) filed written submissions on behalf of the first intervener Stonewall Equality Limited
Ms Jane Rayson and Mr Andrew Powell (instructed by A City Law Firm) filed written submissions on behalf of the second intervener Keshet Diversity UK

Hearing date : 15 November 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment 

Judgment: Re M (Children) [2017] EWCA Civ 2164.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from