Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Perspectives on civil partnerships and marriages in England and Wales: aspects, attitudes and assessments
IntroductionThis article considers the developments since the turn of the century in the provision of new options for same sex and opposite sex couples to formalise their unions with full legal...
Family Law journal - take the survey and you could win £50 worth of vouchers
Do you subscribe to Family Law journal?Our aim is to provide all subscribers of Family Law with compelling, insightful and helpful content that you enjoy reading and find useful in your...
Commencement date of 6 April 2022 announced for the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020
The Ministry of Justice has announced that the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020), which received Royal Assent on 25 June 2020, will now have a commencement date of 6 April 2022....
HMCTS blog highlights the use of video hearing due to COVID-19
HM Courts & Tribunals Service has published a blog detailing the impacts of coronavirus (COVID-19) on hearings. Pre-pandemic, HMCTS states that the use of video technology for live participation...
View all articles
Authors

Re L Revisited

Sep 29, 2018, 16:24 PM
The effect of domestic violence on an application for contact was considered exhaustively in the well-known and much quoted case of Re L (Contact: Domestic Violence); Re V (Contact: Domestic Violence); Re M (Contact: Domestic Violence); Re H (Contact: Domestic Violence) [2000] 2 FLR 334 (Re L).
Slug : re-l-revisited
Meta Title : Re L Revisited
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 19, 2006, 04:21 AM
Article ID : 85135

Richard Little, Barrister, Tooks Chambers. The effect of domestic violence on an application for contact was considered exhaustively in the well-known and much quoted case of Re L (Contact: Domestic Violence); Re V (Contact: Domestic Violence); Re M (Contact: Domestic Violence); Re H (Contact: Domestic Violence) [2000] 2 FLR 334 (Re L). More than 5 years on, what have become of the issues the judgments sought to address? The case comprised a group of four appeals to the Court of Appeal by fathers who had been refused direct contact with their children. All four cases had involved violence in the home. The court availed itself of the, as then, yet to be published report of the Children Act Sub Committee, A Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Question of Parental Contact in Cases where there is Domestic Violence (TSO, 2000) and a report from Drs Sturge and Glaser, eminent child psychiatrists (see Contact and Domestic Violence The Experts' Court Report [2000] Fam Law 615). Taking into account all of the material before it, the court dismissed all four appeals. The court gave valuable general guidance. See July [2006] Fam Law 552 for the full article.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from