Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Re L (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1297

Sep 29, 2018, 19:37 PM
Jurisdiction – Private law children – Brussels IIA – Child arrangements order – Child living in Corfu – Appeal – Whether the court had jurisdiction to make a contact order
The appeal from a decision holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to make a contact order was allowed.
Slug : re-l-a-child-2016-ewca-civ-1297
Meta Title : Re L (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1297
Meta Keywords : Jurisdiction – Private law children – Brussels IIA – Child arrangements order – Child living in Corfu – Appeal – Whether the court had jurisdiction to make a contact order
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 4, 2017, 08:35 AM
Article ID : 113544

(Court of Appeal, Tomlinson, Ryder, King LJJ, 16 December 2016)

Jurisdiction – Private law children – Brussels IIA – Child arrangements order – Child living in Corfu – Appeal – Whether the court had jurisdiction to make a contact order

The appeal from a decision holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to make a contact order was allowed.

The mother and father lived in Corfu where the, now 9-year-old, child was born. When the marriage broke down the mother and child returned to England to live with the maternal aunt and the father remained in Corfu, although the father and child maintained regular contact.

In 2009 the mother died following an aneurysm. The father travelled to the UK to care for the child but a dispute ensued with the maternal family about her long-term care. The maternal aunt believed it was in her best interests to live with her in the UK while the father sought the child’s return to Corfu.

The aunt’s applications for a child arrangements order for her to live with her and for a prohibited steps order preventing her removal to Corfu were dismissed. The judge concluded that it was in the child’s best interests to relocate to Corfu to live with the father. Although he found that it was also in her best interests to retain contact with the maternal family he held that there was no jurisdiction to make a contact order in respect of a child living in Corfu. Future contact arrangements were recorded as an intention in the recitals to the order.

The aunt was granted permission to appeal but prior to the hearing an agreement was reached with the father in respect of contact with the maternal family. It fell to be determined whether the court had jurisdiction to make a contact order to ensure clarity in the event of proceedings taking place in Corfu.

The appeal was allowed. At the time the order was made the child was habitually resident in the UK for the purposes of BIIA. The terms of Art 8 were clear and unequivocal, regardless of when the court first became seised of the matter, it was undeniably seised on the day judgment was given. The judge below had been wrong in concluding that he could not make a contact order when the child was to live in Corfu.


Case No: B4/2016/2534
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 1297
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM CHESTER CIVIL AND
FAMILY JUSTICE CENTRE
His Honour Judge Pearce
CH16P00037
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 16/12/2016

Before:

LORD JUSTICE TOMLINSON

LORD JUSTICE RYDER

and

LADY JUSTICE KING

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

L (A Child)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

John Vater QC and Tom Fazackerley (instructed by Russell & Russell Solicitors) for the Appellant
The Respondent did not attend

Hearing date : 7 December 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment

Re L (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1297.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Jurisdiction
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from