Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Re L (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1297

Sep 29, 2018, 19:37 PM
Jurisdiction – Private law children – Brussels IIA – Child arrangements order – Child living in Corfu – Appeal – Whether the court had jurisdiction to make a contact order
The appeal from a decision holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to make a contact order was allowed.
Slug : re-l-a-child-2016-ewca-civ-1297
Meta Title : Re L (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1297
Meta Keywords : Jurisdiction – Private law children – Brussels IIA – Child arrangements order – Child living in Corfu – Appeal – Whether the court had jurisdiction to make a contact order
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 4, 2017, 08:35 AM
Article ID : 113544

(Court of Appeal, Tomlinson, Ryder, King LJJ, 16 December 2016)

Jurisdiction – Private law children – Brussels IIA – Child arrangements order – Child living in Corfu – Appeal – Whether the court had jurisdiction to make a contact order

The appeal from a decision holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to make a contact order was allowed.

The mother and father lived in Corfu where the, now 9-year-old, child was born. When the marriage broke down the mother and child returned to England to live with the maternal aunt and the father remained in Corfu, although the father and child maintained regular contact.

In 2009 the mother died following an aneurysm. The father travelled to the UK to care for the child but a dispute ensued with the maternal family about her long-term care. The maternal aunt believed it was in her best interests to live with her in the UK while the father sought the child’s return to Corfu.

The aunt’s applications for a child arrangements order for her to live with her and for a prohibited steps order preventing her removal to Corfu were dismissed. The judge concluded that it was in the child’s best interests to relocate to Corfu to live with the father. Although he found that it was also in her best interests to retain contact with the maternal family he held that there was no jurisdiction to make a contact order in respect of a child living in Corfu. Future contact arrangements were recorded as an intention in the recitals to the order.

The aunt was granted permission to appeal but prior to the hearing an agreement was reached with the father in respect of contact with the maternal family. It fell to be determined whether the court had jurisdiction to make a contact order to ensure clarity in the event of proceedings taking place in Corfu.

The appeal was allowed. At the time the order was made the child was habitually resident in the UK for the purposes of BIIA. The terms of Art 8 were clear and unequivocal, regardless of when the court first became seised of the matter, it was undeniably seised on the day judgment was given. The judge below had been wrong in concluding that he could not make a contact order when the child was to live in Corfu.


Case No: B4/2016/2534
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 1297
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM CHESTER CIVIL AND
FAMILY JUSTICE CENTRE
His Honour Judge Pearce
CH16P00037
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 16/12/2016

Before:

LORD JUSTICE TOMLINSON

LORD JUSTICE RYDER

and

LADY JUSTICE KING

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

L (A Child)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

John Vater QC and Tom Fazackerley (instructed by Russell & Russell Solicitors) for the Appellant
The Respondent did not attend

Hearing date : 7 December 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment

Re L (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1297.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Jurisdiction
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from