Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Re K (Order: Delay)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:08 PM
Slug : re-k-order-delay
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 7, 2007, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87017

(Family Division; Baron J; 7 June 2007)

The local authority believed that the child's death was the result of the mother having shaken the child. In the course of care proceedings the court made an order (i) setting the dates for a two-day fact-finding hearing and (ii) requiring the police to disclose all information arising from their investigations by a specific date over 10 weeks before the hearing. The order was made in good time but was not issued until over one month after the deadline for disclosure. In the meantime the police had been informed of the contents of the order, but had not complied with it. The mother did not receive the relevant information until the morning on which the fact-finding hearing was due to begin, and the court date had to be vacated.

The administrative authorities in court should ensure that court orders were issued in good time. In response to the failure to issue or comply with orders, local authorities ought to seek clear directions from the court at an early stage.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from