Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

CONTEMPT: Re JC (Committal Proceedings)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:07 PM
Slug : re-jc-committal-proceedings
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 28, 2007, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 86773

(Court of Appeal; Keene, Thomas and Wall LJJ; 15 August 2007)

The district judge had attached a power of arrest to the non-molestation and occupation order obtained by the mother against the father, finding that the father had used or threatened violence to the mother. At the committal proceedings for alleged breaches of the order the circuit judge, directing himself on the criminal standard of proof, found that the mother's fear of the father was based on 'some violence' on the father's part, taking into account the findings of the district judge. Only two of the alleged breaches were established, an allegation that the father had come within 100 metres of the mother's home and verbally abused her on an unspecified date, and an allegation that the father had threatened to kill the mother. The father was sentenced to 28 days in custody, suspended for 12 months.

The committal judge had been entitled to reach the conclusion he had reached, and to bear in mind the fact that the district judge had made an injunction with power of arrest on the basis of the use or threat of violence. The fact that the committal findings might be used in the on-going care proceedings was neither here nor there.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from